Get Email Alerts
| Register or Login >> | |
 |
|
The First Baby Boomer Speaks! | |
By ScottBittle on October 10th, 2007
On Jan. 1, the first baby boomer turns 62 -- and yes, she'll be signing up for early Social Security benefits. USA Today's Richard Wolf hunted down Kathleen Casey-Kirschling, who was the first child born on Jan. 1, 1946, and thus the first baby in the 78-million-strong baby boom. It's the enormous cost of covering Social Security and Medicare for the boomers that's the biggest problem facing the nation's finances, with an estimated $50 trillion in liabilities bearing down on us. And Casey-Kirschling, like about half of all Social Security recipients, decided it makes more sense to take a smaller benefit at 62 rather than the full amount when she turns 65. "I could be dead next year," she says, "so why not take it this year?" Casey-Kirschling's decision doesn't change the scope of the problem in any way -- but it does mean the problem has actually arrived. The retirement of the baby boomers isn't some far-off concern; it's right in front of us. There's no more time to put this off. Fortunately, and contrary to the conventional wisdom, people can have an honest discussion on this issue. That's what happened in our most recent Facing Up dialogue in New Hampshire, which Wolf covered in a sidebar to the baby boom story. Together, these are the must-read budget stories of the day.
Tags:
1 comment on this entry |
Student ContestThe Challenge: Be the policymaker, the advisor, or the opinion columnist. What do you think about America’s looming fiscal crisis, and what do you think should be done? Entries in our Essay and Media categories will be accepted starting October 1, 2008. Interested to learn more about the contest? Get the details in the Contest Section 
Changing Expectations
»A new report finds the main problem in getting the public to deal with our fiscal problems isn't opposition to tax increases or spending cuts -- it's their lack of trust in the government to spend their money wisely.  
|
Re: The First Baby Boomer Speaks!
The other side of this issue has always been projections for a decline in US population growth, thereby bringing fewer individuals into the workplace to continue supporting the Social Security Ponzi scheme.
Two unpopular points to recall:
Right or wrong, legalized abortion now accounts for about 1.5 million fewer births a year (minus the prevailing trend prior to legalization).
Further, the increase in birthrates among younger, single, under-educated, under-employed parents has given rise to a generation which includes far more "under-acheivers" as well as people more willing to embrace the benefits of a welfare state.
Thus, the problem is not simply that a lot of babies are now older. Another key factor is that the demographics of the US workforce have changed dramatically since Social Security began.
Though I am not an expert, it would not surprise me were I to learn that the ratio of economically productive individuals to non-productive has narrowed significantly over the years.