Essay by:
liumuye
Emporia State University

               In economics terms, the balance budget indicated an achievement that government’s income is equal to its expenditure. For example, a balanced budget occurs when the Federal deficit is $0. Taxes paid to the government equal to government spending. The government neither adds money to, nor subtracts money from, the economy. If state and local governments, businesses and private individuals do not add money to the economy, the total amount of money in the economy remains static.

         In the other situation, when deficit occur, which is the situation that Taxes paid to the government is less than government spending, as the result, it required government to borrow the money to cover it. The U.S. government currently has this huge problem with a great amount of debt due to the deficit. This deficit was accumulated for a long time since 1970, in most years the government was spending much more than it took in. Nowadays, United States have amassed more than 10 trillion dollars in federal debt and another 42 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities, nevertheless, baby boom generation will start to retire in the next few years. This means, U.S. government will spend more in Social Security and Medicare.

           To resolve this huge problem, according to my opinion, U.S. government probably trying to increasing the tax rate, however, that is not for the entire U.S. citizen. This method is especially for those people who have high income, but the problem will be. Which income level can be considered as high-income level? What can be the appropriated rate for the new tax rate? Because according to the president candidates’ viewpoints, they will try to reduce the tax rate for those people who are in low-income standard and rise up the tax rate for people who are rich man. That might be a good method to relieve such a huge spends U.S. government bearing. To reduce the tax rate for those low-income people may cause the revenue the government makes from tax, but government can balance this gap by increasing the tax rate for those rich people. On the other hand, once the government decreases the tax rate, those beneficiaries might have more money to use, so that they could get independency from government. Since they have more money to support themselves, the government does not have to pay such a lot attention to those people. Finally, government could reduce the cost for these projects such as the social security, Medicare, the national health insurance.

          Raising the tax rate might be a good way, but the fact is, since the baby boom generation are going to retire in the following years, the U.S. government also are facing another challenge due to the huge cost for this generation. This means the government has to rearrange the social security system so that they can make responsible for this job. For example, target the social security to who need it the most.  Social Security does not have to provide extra income to those who are fortunate enough to be relatively well-off and are able to fund their own retirement. Furthermore, the government also has to re-think the social security system or try to change it. For instance, person should make a part of response of his future instead of depend on the government. They can make a saving account for their future retirement; the department of social security can manages their accounts, so that they do not have to worry about their account. Although it will create another amount of spending for the government to manage those future retirement account, compare with the enormous money if the government pays all of them, which could be another good way.

           In this situation, to cut off some spending program also will be necessary, such as limit the spending in investment loan. Have more clearly report or plan for each one of their spending before the government makes decision, keep the government debt under control. On the other hand, the balance budget requirement might be make somebody worry that government will reduce the social security benefits, especially for their retirement benefits. However, the social security is a government program, it should undergo with government spending, and the fund for this program is from the tax turn in by the citizens. Otherwise, making a new program makes both citizen and government have problem in the future and will protect balance budget. 




Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

Hey Liumuye,

I definately agree with you on the US government trying to increase the tax rates and how this could benefit us in society. It seems that raising the tax rate would be one of the best ways to reduce the cost of medical care and social security. Great Points, however there are few minor grammatical errors.

Great Job!
Whitney Franklin


Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

You tackled a very touch issue of raising tax rates and you did an excellent job. I agree that by increasing taxes it could in turn increase government spending to create more jobs and services. Great job!!
-Brandon Rich


Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

Your essay was well written and easy to follow. I agree with raising taxes. This would truely benefit our economy, it seems to be the easiest way to decrease our national debt.

Kelsey C.


Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

I agree that we must keep the Government spending under control. Our generation is spending entirely too much money. Great essay!


Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

When it comes to tax rates, you have a great thought on that problem, and i also believe that rasing our taxes with help our economy either in the long run or it could even come to play in a short time. This was a great paper and it had a lot of good points and backups for your thoughts. Good Job!!
Emma Sorensen


Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

Increasing or decreasing the taxes is a 50 50 chance just like a coin toss. Each would have its own advantage. Increasing would help out just fine until the low income people can't afford it anything anymore. Decreasing would take longer but I think that lowering is a better advantage. Nice work comparing them both!

Jordan McManigal


Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

Nice Job! I thought you did a really good job explaining both situations very well!! I do agree that the government could maybe increase taxes, so some of that money could go to paying of the debt!

Whitney Cates


Re: The Huge Trouble with Mass

Tax is the lifeblood of the economy. Increasing tax rate would mean additional income for the government but could also be a burden to most taxpayers. A lot of strategies had been made just to keep the economy stable.We are not yet through with the dilemma on global recession but another problem struck L' Aquila, Italy it was a 6.3 earthquake. . Italy is no stranger to nature's fury, as Mount Etna in Sicily and Mount Vesuvius and Mount Strabo have all wreaked havoc since ancient times. Let us count ourselves fortunate if all we have to worry about is an online cash advance instead of an earthquake


Syndicate content